Table 6.
Comparing the performance of the proposed systems with relevant studies.
| Previous research | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharif et al. [18] | 92.5 | — | — |
| Dandu et al. [19] | 90.2 | — | — |
| Amin et al. [20] | 87 | 92 | 80 |
| Huang et al. [21] | 94.53 | — | — |
| Kaur et al. [22] | 91.51 | 90.65 | 95.79 |
| Kumar et al. [24] | 92.63 | 92.38 | 93.33 |
| Afshar et al. [42] | 92.45 | 90.36 | 91.98 |
| Bahadure et al. [43] | 92.03 | 92.36 | 91.42 |
| Toğaçar et al. [44] | 87.93 | 84.38 | 92.31 |
| Zollner et al. [45] | 85 | 89 | 84 |
| Amarapur [46] | 89 | 85 | 91 |
| Cho et al. [47] | 89.81 | 88.89 | 90.74 |
| Ghassemi et al. [48] | 91.7 | 90.16 | 95.58 |
| David et al. [49] | 85 | 87 | 79 |
| Proposed model | 95.1 | 95.25 | 98.5 |