Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 9;12(1):1848209. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1848209

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The physiological response of isolated cecal bacteria to POPs exposure in vitro. (a) Flow cytometric analyses of proportions of SybrGreen, low nuclei acid (LNA), and HNA-stained cells from isolated cecal bacteria with vehicle or two doses of POPs exposure for 4 h. (b) Flow cytometric analyses of proportions of CFDA, Pi, and DiBAC4-stained cells from isolated cecal bacteria with vehicle or two doses of POPs exposure for 4 h. Values are means ± S.D. (n = 4 per group). * P < .05, ** P < .01, *** P < .001 compare to vehicle

OSZAR »