Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 10;10(3):586–600. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12417

Table 5.

Fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and HOMA‐IR indices across subjects according to sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) status

Pre‐intervention sarcopenic subjects (mean ± SD)/median Post‐intervention sarcopenic subjects (mean ± SD)/median Non‐sarcopenic subjects (mean ± SD)/median
Total DMa non‐DM Total DM non‐DM Total DM non‐DM
Fasting glucose mmol/L (P * value) 5.44 ± 1.2
(P 1 < 0.004)
7.14 ± 1.5 5.17 ± 1.0
(P 1 = 0.011)
5.87 ± 1.3
(P 2 = 0.019)
7.37 ± 1.8
(P 2 = 0.800)
5.62 ± 1.0
(P 2 = 0.015)
5.06 ± 1.1
(P 3 = 0.346)
6.12 ± 0.2
(P 3 = 0.800)
4.96 ± 1.1
(P 3 = 0.436)
Insulin pmol/L (P value) 22.19 ± 17.4
(P 1 = 0.027)
27.39 ± 24.1 21.19 ± 15.9
(P 1 < 0.001)
80.47 ± 99.8
(P 2 < 0.001)
67.47 ± 53.5
(P 2 = 0.801)
82.88 ± 106.7
(P 2 = 0.016)
31.26 ± 24.3
(P 3 = 0.027)
73.71 ± 77.3
(P 3 = 0.327)
29.63 ± 20.6
(P 3 = 0.026)
HOMA‐IR (P value) 0.54
(P 1 = 0.074)
0.41 0.58
(P 1 = 0.069)
1.16
(P 2 = 0.167)
1.64
(P 2 = 0.904)
1.06
(P 2 = 0.159)
0.66
(P 3 = 0.212)
2.84
(P 3 = 0.200)
0.59
(P 3 = 0.503)

DM, diabetes mellitus; HOMA‐IR, homeostasis model assessment‐insulin resistance.

a

The sample size was too small for meaningful P value calculations.

*

The P 1 value represents the significance of differences between pre‐intervention and post‐intervention, the P 2 value represents the significance of differences between post‐intervention sarcopenic and non‐sarcopenic elderly subjects, and the P 3 value represents the significance of differences between pre‐intervention sarcopenic and non‐sarcopenic elderly subjects. P value was calculated by Mann–Whitney U test.

OSZAR »