Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD007760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007760.pub2

36. Positive aspects of caregiving: home palliative care versus usual care.

Study Measure Analysis Follow‐up Significance and direction Details
Higginson 2009
UK
(high quality)
Modified Lawton positivity questionnaire (4 items)
score: range not stated; higher scores equal more positive views; caregiver report
Forwards from enrolment 6 weeks n.s.
ES 0.49
F = 0.50
P value = 0.49
M change from baseline
Intervention (n = 9): M ‐0.3 (SD 1.7; 95% CI ‐1.7 to 1.0)
Control (n = 15): M ‐0.1 (SD ‐0.1; 95% CI ‐1.1 to 1.0)
12 weeks n.s.
ES ‐0.3
F = 0.10
P value = 0.75
M change from baseline
Intervention (n = 8): M ‐0.3 (SD 1.0; 95% CI ‐1.1 to 0.6)
Control (n = 12): M 0.3 (SD 2.0; 95% CI ‐1.0 to 1.5)

CI: confidence interval; ES: effect size; M: mean; n.s.: non‐significant; SD: standard deviation.

OSZAR »