Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD007760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007760.pub2

32. Caregiver pre‐bereavement general health, pain and physical dimensions of quality of life: home palliative care versus usual care.

Study Measure Analysis Follow‐up Significance and direction Details
Jordhøy 2000
Norway
(high quality)
 
and
 
Ahlner‐Elmqvist 2008
Sweden
SF‐36 5 subscales: physical functioning (10 items), role limitation due to physical problems (4 items), bodily pain (2 items), vitality (4 items), and general health perception (5 items).
transformed scores: from 0 to 100; higher scores equal better health; caregiver report 
Backwards from death 44 to 13 months Physical functioning subscale
 
Group main effect: favours intervention
b 5.47
SE 2.55;
P value < 0.05
 
Group by time interaction: marginally significant difference favouring intervention
P value < 0.10 and ≥ 0.05
 
Other 4 subscales
Group main effect and group by time interaction
n.s.
P value ≥ 0.10
Pooled analysis of data from the 2 studies (n = 517); longitudinal analysis of trajectories included pre‐ and post‐bereavement measurements
Findings showed that intervention group scored 5 points higher than controls at the first time point (b 5.47); all other observed differences were not statistically significant
 
b values and SEs for each time interval (in group by time analysis) and graphs with descriptive data on trajectories in scores over time provided in Ringdal 2004 (Jordhøy 2000 and Ahlner‐Elmqvist 2008)
12 to 6 months
5 to 0 months
Forwards from death 1 to 2 months
3 to 5 months
6 to 12 months
13 to 17 months

b: metric regression coefficient; n.s.: non‐significant; SE: standard error.

OSZAR »