Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug 20;94(12):10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.002. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.002

Table 2.

Summary of statistically significant dual-task effects (decline, improvement, no change) and related dual-task interference patterns among gait studies

Study Motor measures Dual-task effects on motor measures Cognitive measures Dual-task effects on cognitive measures Pattern of dual-task interference
Dennis 2009 Gait speed, preferred Significant decline (counting task only) Serial 3s counting accuracy No change Cognitive-related motor interference
Clock task accuracy No change No interference
Gait speed, fast Significant decline (counting task only) Serial 3s counting accuracy No change Cognitive-related motor interference
Clock task accuracy Significant decline Motor-related cognitive interference

Haggard 2000 Stride duration Significant decline (for all cognitive tasks) Word generation accuracy and RT Significant decline (accuracy only) Mutual interference
Mental arithmetic accuracy and RT No change Cognitive-related motor interference
Paired associate monitoring accuracy and RT Significant decline (accuracy only) Mutual interference
Clock task accuracy and RT Significant decline (accuracy only) Mutual interference
Stride duration variability No change Word generation accuracy and RT As above Motor-related cognitive interference
Mental arithmetic accuracy and RT As above No interference
Paired associate monitoring accuracy and RT As above Motor-related cognitive interference
Clock task accuracy and RT As above Motor-related cognitive interference

Hyndman 2006 Gait speed; Stride length Significant decline Number of items correctly recalled from grocery list Significant decline Mutual interference

Kemper 2006 Cadence No change Linguistic measures of language Significant decline Motor-related cognitive interference
Time on task Significant decline Linguistic measures of language As above Mutual interference

Plummer-D'Amato 2008 Gait speed; Stride length; Cadence Significant decline (for all cognitive tasks) 1-back RT and accuracy No change Cognitive-related motor interference
Clock task RT and accuracy No change Cognitive-related motor interference
Spontaneous speech: Words/utterance No change Cognitive-related motor interference
Utterances/narrative Significant decline Mutual interference
Words/narrative Significant decline Mutual interference
Fillers/utterance No change Cognitive-related motor interference
Pauses/utterance Significant decline Mutual interference
Clauses/utterance No change Cognitive-related motor interference
Grammar No change Cognitive-related motor interference
New information Significant improvement Cognitive-priority trade off
Stride duration Significant decline (clock and speech tasks only) 1-back RT and accuracy As above No interference
Clock task RT and accuracy As above As above
Spontaneous speech: (as above) As above As above
Stride duration variability No change 1-back RT and accuracy As above No interference
Clock task RT and accuracy As above No interference
Spontaneous speech: Words/utterance No change No interference
Utterances/narrative Significant decline Motor-related cognitive interference
Words/narrative Significant decline Motor-related cognitive interference
Fillers/utterance No change No interference
Pauses/utterance Significant decline Motor-related cognitive interference
Clauses/utterance No change No interference
Grammar No change No interference
New information Significant improvement Cognitive facilitation

Plummer-D'Amato 2010 DLS total; DLS paretic loading phase Significant decline Cognitive performance reported in Plummer-D'Amato 2008 See Plummer-D'Amato 2008 1-back and clock tasks: Cognitive-related motor interference
Spontaneous speech: As for gait speed, stride length, cadence (see Plummer-D'Amato 2008)
Swing duration (paretic limb) Significant decline As above
DLS paretic unloading; Swing duration variability; Temporal asymmetry No change 1-back and clock tasks: No interference
Spontaneous speech: As for stride duration variability (see Plummer-D'Amato 2008)

Regnaux 2005 (treadmill walking) Stride duration No change Reaction time (probe reaction time task) Significant decline Motor-related cognitive interference

Abbreviations: DLS, double limb support duration; RT, reaction time

OSZAR »