Abstract
Acinetobacter soli is a new bacterial species described from forest soil. Five cases of bloodstream infection caused by A. soli clonal isolates are reported here for the first time. The patients were neonates admitted to an intensive care unit. This is a new neonatal pathogen with the potential to cause outbreaks.
TEXT
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain one of the most important complications in neonates admitted to hospitals (15). Although Acinetobacter sp. is a frequent pathogen in health care-associated infections, to date, only a few outbreaks of BSI caused by this agent in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have been described. Typically, these outbreaks are due to cross-transmission of strains, and a strong effort with combined interventions is essential to their control (9). Acinetobacter baumannii is the most pathogenic species of this genus (3); however, outbreaks caused by other species, such as Acinetobacter junii (2) and Acinetobacter ursingii (8), have been occasionally reported. In the present study, Acinetobacter soli, a species previously isolated only from forest soil (6), is described as the cause of an outbreak of BSI in neonates.
From 31 March to 8 April 2005, five neonates admitted to a 10-bed intensive care ward presented with symptoms of sepsis and isolation of a Gram-negative nonfermentative oxidase-negative rod from blood samples. The five isolates collected, one from each neonate, had identical colony morphology and biochemical reactions, but results were inconclusive. The infected neonates had been admitted to the unit on the days of their birth. The unit was a regular hospital ward adapted for intensive care, because the original neonatal intensive care unit in the hospital was closed a year before due to structural problems. On 8 April, after the fifth infant developed BSI with the unidentified rod, an outbreak became evident, and the neonates were transferred to another hospital; the ward was then closed. One neonate, who was severely compromised, progressed to death. The other four children were cured. All had negative blood cultures after 7 to 10 days of treatment. The clinical characteristics of patients with infection by the outbreak strain are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics of patients with the outbreak strain
Characteristic | Information for patient: |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Sex | Female | Female | Male | Female | Male |
Gestational age (wk) | 35 | 39 | 34 | 37 | 38 |
Mother's health | HIV positive | Healthy | Healthy | Healthy | Healthy |
Childbirth | Cesarean section | Vaginal | Cesarean section | Cesarean section | Vaginal |
Birth wt (g) | 1,350 | 3,360 | 2,285 | 2,670 | 2,655 |
Twin pregnancy | Yes | No | No | No | No |
Baseline condition | First twin stillborn, hypoactive | Hypoxia | Congenital metabolic disease | Hypoxia | Meconium aspiration syndrome |
Respiratory distress | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Date of isolation of BGNa | 31 March 2005 | 2 April 2005 | 5 April 2005 | 6 April 2005 | 8 April 2005 |
Days from admission to BGN isolation | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 17 |
Medical procedure(s) before BGN isolation | Peripheral vein | Oxygen hood, peripheral vein | Intermittent mechanical ventilation, peripheral vein | Intermittent mechanical ventilation, peripheral vein | Central venous catheter, total parenteral nutrition |
Antibiotic therapy before BGN isolation (no. of days)/reason | Ampicillin plus gentamicin (6)/clinical sepsis of maternal origin | None | Ampicillin plus gentamicin (2)/clinical sepsis of hospital origin | Ampicillin plus gentamicin (4)/clinical sepsis of maternal origin | Ampicillin plus gentamicin (10)/clinical sepsis of maternal origin; cefepime (7)/pneumonia |
Antibiotic therapy to treat BGN (no. of days) | Cefepime (7) | Ampicillin plus gentamicin (14) | Cefepime (1) | Cefepime (2) followed by meropenem (12) and ciprofloxacin (10) | Cefepime, vancomycin, clarithromycin, and ciprofloxacin (7) |
Outcome | Discharge | Discharge | Death | Discharge | Discharge |
BGN, Gram-negative bacillus in the present study.
Biochemical properties of the study isolates were determined with API 20NE (bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO) and conventional tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility to amikacin, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, and tobramycin was tested by disk diffusion (1). The colistin MIC was determined by broth microdilution (1).
DNA fingerprints were determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with SpeI (Promega, Madison, WI) (10) and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR (4). The species identification was performed by 16S rRNA (13), the rpoB gene, and flanking spacers (7) and gyrB gene (14) sequence analysis. To obtain the gyrB gene complete coding sequence, primers Rubgyr-sF (5′-CGC GTC GTT TAA GAG AGT T-3′) and Rubgyr-sR (5′-CGC AAT ATC CAA CGC ACT T-3′) were designed for PCR amplification and sequencing, with the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, 33 cycles at 95°C for 1 min, 51°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The sequences obtained in our study were compared to those of the single fully characterized, first described A. soli strain B1T (6) and four other sequences of unpublished isolates deposited in GenBank, one rpoB sequence (GenBank accession number HM570037) and three 16S rRNA gene sequences (GenBank accession numbers FJ976560, FJ976568, and GQ258635).
All five study isolates shared very similar phenotypic characteristics. Cells grew well on Trypticase soy agar (TSA) and MacConkey agar media. On TSA, bacterial colonies were circular, convex, and smooth, had margins, and were approximately 2 mm in diameter after 24 h of incubation at 30°C. The isolates were Gram-negative rods, catalase positive, oxidase negative, nonmotile, and nonhemolytic on sheep blood agar. Biochemical test reactions were all negative, except for urease production. On API 20NE, the isolates had positive reactions for d-glucose assimilation, potassium gluconate, capric acid, adipic acid, malic acid, trisodium citrate, urease activity, and esculin hydrolysis. This biochemical profile gave an inconclusive identification. Isolates were susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested, including colistin (MIC, 0.25 μg/ml). All had indistinguishable PFGE and RAPD-PCR fingerprint patterns. PFGE fingerprints had 15 bands of about 194 kb to less than 48.5 kb.
All isolates shared identical 1,108-bp 16S rRNA gene sequences and were deposited in GenBank. Those sequences had 99 to 100% similarity with those of strain B1T (6) and the three other A. soli sequences in GenBank (accession numbers FJ976560, FJ976568, and GQ25863). This high level of similarity with A. soli strongly indicated the identification of the strain. However, since this species had not been previously isolated from a clinical specimen while this work was taking place, a genetic identification in more detail was undertaken.
The gyrB and the partial rpoB gene and spacer sequences of two of the five isolates (788BRRJ and 789BRRJ) were studied. All results for both isolates were identical, and only the sequences of strain 788BRRJ were deposited in GenBank. In the analysis by BLASTn, the highest similarities were with two A. soli isolates, as follows: 98% for gyrB of strain B1T (GenBank accession number EU622818) and 99% for rpoB zone 1 of strain K50-54 (GenBank accession HM570037.1). Thus, the 16S rRNA gene, gyrB, and rpoB sequences were concordant and defined the strain identification as A. soli.
In the present report, we describe an outbreak of BSI caused by A. soli, a species described in 2008 from an environmental specimen (6). The outbreak occurred in neonates admitted to an intensive care unit, a population prone to developing health care-associated infections. On the other hand, four of the five neonates were receiving antibiotics to which the bacterial isolate was susceptible, which is consistent with the hypothesis that a contaminated IV solution was the source of the outbreak. In fact, the five neonates had infections with a single genotype defined by two well-established fingerprinting methods, indicating that a point source and cross-transmission of the strain occurred in the unit. Alternatively, the laboratory reagents could have been contaminated by A. soli (a pseudo-outbreak). However, this is unlikely because all neonates had sepsis symptoms when blood cultures were drawn. Unfortunately, the unit was closed before any investigation could be carried out. Overcrowding and understaffing, conditions that facilitate the dissemination of pathogens, are common in neonatal units in many parts of the world and have been documented in a previous outbreak study in another NICU in our municipal health system (11). Hygienic conditions in the unit, a place originally used as a regular ward, were suboptimal and contributed to the decision to close the unit. No other isolates with similar characteristics were obtained from infants in the hospital to which they were transferred.
In distinction from the prototype A. soli strain B1T, which had resistance to amikacin and gentamicin, the A. soli isolates of this study were susceptible to all agents tested, including these two aminoglycosides. This full susceptibility profile may have contributed to the success of the antimicrobial therapy observed in almost all cases. In fact, the single infant who died had a congenital metabolic disease that was probably the major determinant of the outcome.
Because this was the first time A. soli was detected from a clinical specimen, three sequence signatures, those for 16S rRNA, gyrB, and rpoB, were determined. The three methods gave consistent results; however, sequencing of the 351-bp rpoB zone 1 fragment seemed most convenient, as it alone provided an adequate discriminatory power.
Recently, with the use of sequence-based methods to identify Acinetobacter isolates to the species level, it became clear that several non-A. baumannii species cause severe clinical infections (12). Nevertheless, the epidemiological features and clinical impact of non-A. baumannii infections are still poorly understood. Multidrug resistance, for example, has been an important issue in A. baumannii infections, leading to the extensive use of polymyxins as a last resort, even in neonates, as recently reviewed (5). However, as Turton and colleagues have observed (12), the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance may vary widely across non-A. baumannii species. In the present outbreak, isolates of A. soli were susceptible to several antimicrobial agents.
In conclusion, we show for the first time that A. soli may cause invasive disease and may spread among patients. Antimicrobial resistance does not seem to be a problem at the moment. Identification by sequencing a small rpoB fragment (zone 1) is feasible.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
All five isolates described here were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers FJ872517 to FJ872521. The sequences of strain 788BRRJ were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers HQ418340 to HQ418343.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) PRODOC 1669/2008, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) of Brazil, and the Fogarty International Program in Global Infectious Diseases (grant TW006563) of the National Institutes of Health. We declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 27 April 2011.
REFERENCES
- 1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2010. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 20th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S20. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
- 2. de Beaufort A. J., Bernards A. T., Dijkshoorn L., van Boven C. P. A. 1999. Acinetobacter junii causes life-threatening sepsis in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 88:772–775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Dijkshoorn L., Nemec A., Seifert H. 2007. An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5:939–951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Grundmann H. J., et al. 1997. Multicenter study using standardized protocols and reagents for evaluation of reproducibility of PCR-based fingerprinting of Acinetobacter spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3071–3077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Jajoo M., Kumar V., Jain M., Kumari S., Manchanda V. 2011. Intravenous colistin administration in neonates. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 30:218–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kim D., et al. 2008. Acinetobacter soli sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. J. Microbiol. 46:396–401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. La Scola B., Gundi V., Khamis A., Raoult D. 2006. Sequencing of the rpoB gene and flanking spacers for molecular identification of Acinetobacter species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:827–832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Máder K., et al. 2010. Outbreak of septicaemic cases caused by Acinetobacter ursingii in a neonatal intensive care unit. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 300:338–340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. McGrath E. J., et al. 2011. An outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection in a neonatal intensive care unit: investigation and control. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 32:34–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pellegrino F. L. P. C., et al. 2002. Occurrence of a multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clone in different hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2420–2424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pessoa-Silva C. L., et al. 2002. Infection due to extended-spectrum-β-lactamase producing Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Infantis in a neonatal unit. J. Pediatr. 141:381–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Turton J. F., Shah J., Ozongwu C., Pike R. 2010. Incidence of Acinetobacter species other than A. baumannii among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter: evidence for emerging species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:1445–1449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Watts J. L., Lowery D. E., Teel J. F., Rossbach S. 2000. Identification of Corynebacterium bovis and other coryneforms isolated from bovine mammary glands. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2373–2379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Yamamoto S., Harayama S. 1995. PCR amplification and direct sequencing of gyrB genes with universal primers and their application to the detection and taxonomic analysis of Pseudomonas putida strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:1104–1109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zingg W., Posfay-Barbe K. M., Pittet D. 2008. Healthcare-associated infections in neonates. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 21:228–234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]