Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Immunology
. 1970 Nov;7(5):723–737.

Studies on eosinophil leucocyte migration. II. Factors specifically chemotactic for eosinophils and neutrophils generated from guinea-pig serum by antigen–antibody complexes

A B Kay
PMCID: PMC1712893  PMID: 4992784

Abstract

Chemotactic activity for eosinophils and neutrophils has been studied using guinea-pig serum activated by preformed antigen–antibody complexes.

Rabbit complexes or complexes prepared either with guinea-pig IgG2 or IgG1 were equally capable of generating a heat stable activity from guinea-pig serum that was chemotactic for guinea-pig eosinophils and for neutrophils of both the guinea-pig and the rabbit. This was distinguished from a relatively heat-labile chemotactic activity present in untreated guinea-pig serum.

The heat-stable complex-mediated chemotactic activity was thought to be complement dependent since chemotaxis for eosinophils or neutrophils could not be generated from heated serum, ammonia treated serum or from serum treated with complexes in the presence of 0·01 M EDTA.

Guinea-pig sera, activated either with rabbit, guinea-pig IgG1 or IgG2 complexes, was fractionated by sucrose-density gradient ultracentrifugation and by Sephadex chromatography. In all experiments two peaks of cell specific chemotactic activity could be separated. The peak of activity for guinea-pig neutrophils was approximately 4·5S and in the fractionation range of proteins having a molecular weight of between 65,000 and 85,000. The peak of guinea-pig eosinophil chemotactic activity was 1·5S–2S and in the molecular weight range of between 15,000 and 20,000. Those fractions which were chemotactic for guinea-pig neutrophils did not attract rabbit neutrophils. Rabbit neutrophils migrated towards those fractions of guinea-pig serum chemotactic for guinea-pig eosinophils; therefore, the properties associated with guinea-pig eosinophil chemotactic activity were similar to previously published data for a fragment cleaved from the 5th component of complement.

Full text

PDF
723

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLOCH K. J., KOURILSKY F. M., OVARY Z., BENACERRAF B. Properties of guinea pig 7S antibodies. III. Identification of antibodies involved in complement fixation and hemolysis. J Exp Med. 1963 Jun 1;117:965–981. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.6.965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BOYDEN S. The chemotactic effect of mixtures of antibody and antigen on polymorphonuclear leucocytes. J Exp Med. 1962 Mar 1;115:453–466. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.3.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Feinstein A., Hobart M. J. Structural relationship and complement fixing activity of sheep and other ruminant immunoglobulin G subclasses. Nature. 1969 Aug 30;223(5209):950–952. doi: 10.1038/223950a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HIRSCH J. G., CHURCH A. B. Studies of phagocytosis of group A streptococci by polymorphonuclear leucocytes in vitro. J Exp Med. 1960 Mar 1;111:309–322. doi: 10.1084/jem.111.3.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kay A. B. Studies on eosinophil leucocyte migration. I. Eosinophil and neutrophil accumulation following antigen-antibody reactions in guinea-pig skin. Clin Exp Immunol. 1970 Jan;6(1):75–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keller H. U., Nussenzweig V., Sorkin E. Studies on chemotaxis. 8. The role of 7S-gamma-1 and 7S-gamma-2 guinea-pig antibodies for chemotaxis in granulocytes. Immunochemistry. 1968 May;5(3):293–295. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(68)90073-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Keller H. U., Sorkin E. Studies on chemotaxis. 13. Differences in the chemotactic responses of neutrophil and eosinophil polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1969;35(3):279–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. OVARY Z., BENACERRAF B., BLOCH K. J. Properties of guinea pig 7S antibodies. II. Identification of antibodies involved in passive cutaneous and systemic anaphylaxis. J Exp Med. 1963 Jun 1;117:951–964. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.6.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Osler A. G., Oliveira B., Shin H. S., Sandberg A. L. The fixation of guinea pig complement by gamma 1 and gamma 2 immunoglobulins. J Immunol. 1969 Jan;102(1):269–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shin H. S., Gewurz H., Snyderman R. Reaction of a cobra venom factor with guinea pig complement and generation of an activity chemotactic for polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1969 May;131(1):203–207. doi: 10.3181/00379727-131-33840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shin H. S., Snyderman R., Friedman E., Mellors A., Mayer M. M. Chemotactic and anaphylatoxic fragment cleaved from the fifth component of guinea pig complement. Science. 1968 Oct 18;162(3851):361–363. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3851.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Snyderman R., Gewurz H., Mergenhagen S. E. Interactions of the complement system with endotoxic lipopolysaccharide. Generation of a factor chemotactic for polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Aug 1;128(2):259–275. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.2.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ward P. A. Chemotaxis of human eosinophils. Am J Pathol. 1969 Jan;54(1):121–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ward P. A., Cochrane C. G., Muller-Eberhard H. J. Further studies on the chemotactic factor of complement and its formation in vivo. Immunology. 1966 Aug;11(2):141–153. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilkinson P. C., Borel J. F., Stecher-Levin V. J., Sorkin E. Macrophage and neutrophil specific chemotactic factors in serum. Nature. 1969 Apr 19;222(5190):244–247. doi: 10.1038/222244a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES

OSZAR »